August 2018
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tamiz v Google Inc; CA 14 Feb 2013

References: [2013] EWCA Civ 68, [2013] WLR (D) 65, [2013] EMLR 14, [2013] 1 WLR 2151
Links: Bailii, WLRD
Coram: Lord Dyson MR, Richards, Sullivan LJJ
Statutes: Defamation Act 1996
This case cites:

  • Cited – Dow Jones & Co Inc v Jameel CA (Bailii, [2005] EWCA Civ 75, Times 14-Feb-05, [2005] EMLR 16, [2005] QB 946, [2005] 2 WLR 1614, [2005] EMLR 353)
    The defendant complained that the presumption in English law that the victim of a libel had suffered damage was incompatible with his right to a fair trial. They said the statements complained of were repetitions of statements made by US . .
  • Cited – Smith v ADVFN Plc and others QBD (Bailii, [2008] EWHC 1797 (QB))
    The claimant had brought multiple actions in defamation against anonymous posters on an online forum. The claimant sought to lift the stay which had been imposed because of the number of actions. The claimant had not yet paid outstanding costs . .
  • Cited – Smith v ADVFN Plc and others QBD (Bailii, [2008] EWHC 1797 (QB))
    The claimant had brought multiple actions in defamation against anonymous posters on an online forum. The claimant sought to lift the stay which had been imposed because of the number of actions. The claimant had not yet paid outstanding costs . .
  • Appeal from – Tamiz v Google Inc Google UK Ltd QBD (Bailii, [2012] EWHC 449 (QB), [2012] EMLR 24)
    The claimant sought damages in defamation against the defendant company offering internet search facilities. The words complained of had been published in a blog, and in comments published on the blog.
    Held: Jurisdiction should be declined. . .

(This list may be incomplete)

Last Update: 26-Apr-16
Ref: 470970