January 2019
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Sikuta v Hungary; ECHR 27 Jan 2015

References: 26127/11 – Committee Judgment, [2015] ECHR 91
Links: Bailii
Coram: Helen Keller, P
ECHR The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – read alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention – that the imposition of 98% tax on the upper bracket of his severance payment constituted an unjustified deprivation of property, or else taxation at a disproportionate rate, with no remedy available.
Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights P1A1 14

Leave a Reply