May 2019
« Jul    

Carslogie Steamship Co Ltd v Royal Norwegian Government; HL 1952

References: [1952] AC 292, [1951] UKHL 4
Links: Bailii
Coram: Viscount Jowitt
The plaintiff’s vessel had been damaged in a collision, and underwent temporary repairs at Port Glasgow. It was certified as authorised ‘to be confirmed in her present class without fresh record of survey, subject to certain permanent repairs at the owner’s convenience’ Having sailed for New York on a trading voyage, whether or not she was in ballast, she sustained heavy weather damage which necessitated 30 days of repair time in New York. During 10 days of that period the repairs to the collision damage were also carried out.
Held: The claim for loss of use during that 10 day period failed. The vessel was ‘incapable of gainful use during the 10 days necessary to complete her collision repairs’. Viscount Jowitt was willing to assume that the collision was a cause of her detention in New York, but she would have been detained for that period in any event
This case is cited by:

  • Cited – Chester v Afshar HL ([2005] 1 AC 134, House of Lords, Bailii, [2004] UKHL 41, Times 19-Oct-04, [2004] 3 WLR 927, 67 BMLR 66)
    The claimant suffered back pain for which she required neurosurgery. The operation was associated with a 1-2% risk of the cauda equina syndrome, of which she was not warned. She went ahead with the surgery, and suffered that complication. The . .
  • Cited – Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishka Kaisha (‘The Golden Victory’) HL (Bailii, [2007] UKHL 12, Times 30-Mar-07, [2007] 2 Lloyds Rep 164, [2007] Bus LR 997, [2007] 3 All ER 1, [2007] 2 AC 353, [2007] 1 CLC 352, [2007] 2 WLR 691, [2007] 2 All ER (Comm) 97)
    The claimant sought damages for repudiation of a charterparty. The charterpary had been intended to continue until 2005. The charterer repudiated the contract and that repudiation was accepted, but before the arbitrator could set his award, the Iraq . .

Leave a Reply