References:  AC 335,  1 All ER 13
Coram: Viscount Simon
The House considered whether British American had a ‘controlling interest’ in a subsidiary of its direct subsidiary. The company argued that ‘controlling interest’ equated to beneficial ownership. In rejecting that argument Viscount Simon said: ‘I find it impossible to adopt the view that a person who (by having requisite voting power in a company subject to his will and ordering) can make the ultimate decision as to where and how the business of the company shall be carried on and who thus has, in fact, control of the company’s affairs, is a person of whom it can be said that he has not in this connection got a controlling interest in the company.’
This case is cited by:
- Distinguished – Bermuda Cablevision Limited and others v Colica Trust Company Limited PC (Times 31-Oct-97, Bailii,  UKPC 44)
(Bermuda) An alternative remedy to winding up is available to a shareholder where oppressive conduct is alleged, though the main thrust is that the conduct is unlawful. . .